Sanwa/Airtronics RX-47T 2.4GHz FHSS-4 4-Channel Telemetry Receiver

Nice small footprint receiver. Been 100% reliable in my 22 3.0 for a few months now. Allows me to mount my electronics down the center without using a lopro servo. Response is as good, if not quicker than my RX-461. Those of you wondering where you plug in telemetry sensors... you can't. This requires a Sanwa ESC like the Vortex Zero in order to have telemetry functionality. Also allows for programming of the Sanwa ESC from a compatible radio. Expensive, but sadly is relatively reasonable compared to other Sanwa receivers like the 462. Definitely recommended if you are a Sanwa driver.

I have a couple of these I'm using with a Sanwa MT-44. They are tiny, fast, and work great. Pretty much the same receiver as the RX-472. The main difference is the RX-472 supports FHSS3 (older controllers) and FH4T; whereas this only supports FH4T.

Bonus; I can read my receiver voltage from my radio without any add-ons; that's handy for nitro racing. I know its telemetry but my experience with Futaba and Spektrum radios you normally need sensors. Even Sanwa has the RX-462 that has a voltage sensor wire; so I wasn't expecting it to read receiver voltage, but it does!

I like the clean look of the wiresless rx better, but for the price it has worked well. is a bit bigger than the wireless if you are running on road and space is premium.

Excellent replacement for my RX-482 that came with my MT-S I use in my RC8B3.
Had to replace the 482 (and still three others) because the signal is terrible with those antenna-less receivers. Drive near one little bush or a little bump in the ground from no more than 50 ft away and it looses the signal. The 47T has no trouble from so far away I can barely see it anymore.
I see the 47T as a huge upgrade.
I still have 3 more RX-482s to replace all mounted in different brands of cars and the signal loss is the same with all of them and everything I own is nitro. Still not sure if that has anything to do with it but I've read the 482s are great at the track. I don't have a track here, just miles of desert and this 47T is perfect for it.
Too bad Amain doesn't sell the MT-S without a rx.

The difference between RX-47T and RX-472 is the lack of support for both FHSS3 and SSL (Sanwa Synchronized Link) in the RX-47T. If you don't use these functions, the RX-47T receiver is a great deal.